07
May 15

Techno #01 Acuite: Construction Intelligence

In this blog series we look at technology in real estate development and construction. Today we interview Antonia and David the founders of an ambitious new start-up ‘Acuite’ – soon to be publicly launched.

acuiteDirectors

Antonia, how did you and David get started on the road to entrepreneurship?

Both David and I have always had the motivation to create something big, bigger than us, to add value to others, create a legacy and become successful. Since we completed our qualifications, we secured good jobs, built a house and started settling in…But the motivation was still itching, and we were not content. The hardest part was getting started. 

Our entire careers were built around the property and construction industry, an industry we are extremely passionate about. We were running multi-million dollar projects with extremely lean margin levels (5%) and significant risk profile. We weren’t surprised to learn that on a global level 77% of executives experience under-performing projects, and that 50% of these projects experience cost over-runs of between 10 and 200%. The sad thing is, often for many construction companies a project that has made no margin is still considered as a good outcome.

We decided to do something about it, we dedicated our entire nights and weekends to develop a visual representation of a concept we had. We joined forces with The Icehouse (NZ’ leading business incubation centre) and went through a comprehensive market validation phase. Once we started to see really strong traction from the market we decided to take the leap, re-mortgage our home, quit our day jobs and dedicate ourselves to this venture in full capacity.

 

Tell us about Acuite – what’s your elevator pitch?

77% of executives in the construction industry are currently experiencing under performing projects. The problem? – Time delays, poor estimating practices, failed risk management, and poor performance by sub-contractors. The solution? Enter Acuite.

Acuite is a cloud based SaaS web application that provides real time visibility and analysis of critical performance metrics across projects.

This enables firms to better manage risk while maximising value & performance.

What sets us apart? – Our Industry expertise, market positioning, algorithms, intuitive design and product development in conjunction with three leading NZ organizations.

 

For our audience, mainly property development, consulting and construction professionals, what do you see as the three most important functions of your software?

  1. We provide real time visibility across portfolios and into projects through collating & displaying real-time metrics & critical KPI data via user friendly drill down dashboards. Additionally, all team members can make decisions based on up-to-date and accurate information from every level of your operation.
  1. Because critical metrics are available real time, we can cut the times currently spent of manualised reporting processes. This also provides one source of truth and a consistent view of performance for all members of the organization.   
  1. In complementing a comprehensive risk management feature set, we provide a unique internal Benchmarking ability that means risks across the organization can be easily identified and dealt with, before it is too late.

 

I understand you have three of New Zealand’s top mid tier contractors on board – can you tell me who your target market is and will New Zealand be enough?

We are fortunate to work with some of the most innovative, entrepreneurial and largest construction firms in NZ. These companies are paving the future for something global, they see our vision and recognize its value. They have been extremely supportive and are playing a significant part in the Acuite journey.

Our target market is mid-tier to large scale commercial construction firms, with an annual turnover of $50m to $300m. The market size in NZ is limited and our strategy from day one is to create a global success story. We are starting off with NZ and AU, followed by the US.

 

How did you find the recent Ice Angels investor pitch evening?  – I was there and it looked a daunting prospect, although your presentation was polished and you looked totally in control.

It was nerve-racking because we knew how significant the opportunity was, failing was not an option. It was an opportunity to showcase our vision and achievements to technology, business experts and high net worth individuals. Very similar to the Dragons Den, we had 8 minutes to pitch why Acuite was the best investment opportunity for them.  We practiced the pitch for three days pretty much full time, it was worth it – we attracted significant interest and currently going through the due diligence process.

 

Do you have any suggestions for those budding techpreneurs with ideas but not sure where to start?

Ok, so here are our practical tips; 

  1. Define clearly what pain you are solving and what is your proposition
  1. Undertake a market validation analysis – talk to your target market, ask all of them the same questions and as a result conclude what the market wants / needs are (you will be surprised because what you think the market want and need is most likely different to what you originally had in mind, that’s good!)
  1. If the market needs are severe and you conclude that there is an opportunity, take the next step – invest couple of thousands of dollars and create a visual prototype of your solution
  1. Pre-sell your product to prospective customers (start with those you interviewed at the market validation phase).
  1. If you followed 1 to 4 you should have some good traction, now you need to start building a minimum viable version of your product. You can either do this yourself, bring together people that can help, or raise some money to get started from family and friends. 

 

What have been your biggest obstacles so far?

When we first started the journey we had another co-founder, we were a solid team of three. Building a start-up is time consuming and not easy, unfortunately due to family commitments he had to step down. A third of our resource and funding had disappeared instantly.

There are constant obstacles, and you just have to be persistent and not give up. We keep saying to ourselves, if it was easy everyone would be doing it.

 

Who are your role models, those that inspire you to give up your day job and tackle such a project as Acuite. 

I love reading about NZ’s global tech companies that started from nothing. Reading Derek Hendly’s book ‘Heart to Start’ was a significant inspirational boost when we first started. 

 

Finally, tell me where you will be in 2025 – should I be looking at the digital billboards (whatever new technology they will be by then) in Times Square?

Yes, we aim to become a global leader in intelligent technology for the construction industry. By 2025, productivity in the construction sector would increase significantly, and Acuite would save construction firms across the globe billions of dollars on an annual basis.

 

AcuiteLogo_WithTag_BlueGray
Contact Antonia Speight +64 21 680 609  antonia@acuite.co.nz

 

Interviewed by Andrew.Crosby@aenspire.com
Andrew founded a start-up software company in 2000 “CollaborIT” specialising in online collaboration for construction and development projects. Since then he has taken an active interest in how to improve the intellectual mechanics and productivity in property development and construction. Andrew has been a sounding board and supporter of Acuite and the solutions it provides to industry wide under-performance since its inception.

www.aenspire.com

 


03
May 15

Starchitects, Celebritects & Archikardasians

Star Architects, Celebrity Architects and Architects known widely simply because they are in all the magazines, have become part of the common built form vernacular.

I have found myself recently using the term ‘starchitect’ again after a multi-year hiatus. I think it has something to do with these so called elitist architects, whilst always recognised for their notable public and commercial buildings, have now again entered residential development. Of course many famous architects in the past have always being doing this but it was during the previous boom that really got into profiling and publicly associating developments with these masters of architecture:
http://www.metropolismag.com/April-2006/Starchitect-Condos-2005/

 

I recall one brush I had with starchitecture; it was one hell of a humid day, I had just emerged from the Boston subway at the Kendall Square Station, my destination an old brick building that now housed the MIT Center for Real Estate. With the sweat increasing I found myself walking past the most odd of buildings, a cartoon style structure – the MIT strata center.

stata-center-mitSource: http://www.eitc.org/ 

To take a break and soak up some air-conditioning I made a concerted effort to walk through the building on my way home after class. It was very interesting inside and out. A little research that night uncovered the building had some issues with surprise, surprise some of the details and MIT had sued Frank Gehry:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-08-17/bashing-architects-with-lawsuit-only-kills-innovation-james-s-russell

Since that fateful commission Frank Gehry has designed some notable apartment and condominium buildings.

New York by Gehry
gehryResisdencesSource: http://www.newyorkbygehry.com/

The apartment building developers obviously targeted the appeal of Gehry’s reputation in naming the building after him – here’s an interesting article about living in what some big applers call a work of art :
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/nyregion/living-inside-new-york-by-gehry.html

 

Opus Hong Kong
gehryHKSource: http://www.opushongkong.com/

Opus, breaks all sorts of $ records, significantly helped by its dramatic location perched on ‘The Peak’ in Hong Kong as shown in http://fortune.com/2012/11/15/inside-frank-gehrys-surreal-opus-hong-kong/

 

Some recently designed buildings by other Starchitects include:

Herzog and De-Meuron Canary WharfHM-CanarySource: http://www.archdaily.com/529812/canary-wharf-development-including-herzog-and-de-meuron-tower-wins-planning-approval/

 

Zaha Hadid 520 W 28th St New York
520-west-28th-street-z160713-zpanSource: http://www.e-architect.co.uk/new-york/520-west-28th-street

 

Phillipe Starck Yoo Montreal (just broken ground April 2015)starckSource: http://www.yoomontreal.com/

Of course Starck is well know for his interiors and this development does not dissapoint.
starckinteriorSource: http://www.yoomontreal.com/

Typically the idea is to make money off the architects name – one source quotes Having a celebrity architect design a project adds a couple hundred thousand dollars, or an additional 1 to 3 percent,” says developer Aby Rosen, who owns the Seagram Building.

Of course just like the Stata Center these buildings can backfire on the architect and the developer using the architects name or at least produce mixed results as this article, albeit pre the recent surge in NY apartment values, describes:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/11/realestate/starchitect-buildings-test-the-value-of-a-name.html

That means there are also plenty of Starchitect plans that just don’t get off the ground (end of a cycle anyone?) for example Santiago Calatrava’s 80 South Street. Santiago is arguably best known for his bridges not condo towers though! – as I describe in a previous blog.

For another perspective on Starchitecture in general you may want to get hold of a copy of the book STARCHITECTURE Scenes, Actors and Spectacles in Contemporary Cities by Davide Ponzini and Michele Nastasi, 2011

 

Andrew.Crosby@aenspire.com
www.aenspire.com

 

 


19
Apr 15

Quality in Construction Part 1: Whats an eave between friends?

In this blog series we look at a number of aspects that concern modern day quality of construction.

My team had an interesting discussion the other day, despite the fact it concerned not the most exciting of subjects: eaves.

Our discussion focused on do we need eaves in our medium density developments and if so how deep do they need to be and what risk are we taking on if we remove them.

eaves
Frank Lloyd Wright - a big fan of large eaves

Developing medium density housing at a gross density  1:200m2 or (50 homes per hectare) where most of the houses are standalone, requires a high attention to detail that needs to be addressed early on. At this density it is the space between buildings and site boundaries that is critically important. In a zero lot line configuration, there may only be 1.2m between homes. We are into design, consenting and contracting on about 20 of these sites at the moment and we are finding every centimeter counts.

Despite New Zealand’s leaky building crisis and a sea of wrapped townhouse schemes having to be re-clad the basic fundamental weather protection of an eave seems to have escaped the lexicon for many designers.

The pressure to remove eaves is a direct result of planning regulations because when applying height in relation to boundary rules, it is the eave that is first to infringe. The easy fix is to clip the eaves which allows you to move the wall closer to the boundary.

In addition, wider eaves increase the percentage of impermeable area on a development site which many zoning regimes seek to control for storm water runoff – so deeper eaves can mean less sell-able floor area.

There are also modern design pressures, what I will term the ‘monolithic architectural style’,  requires solid forms not ruined by punctuating with functional rain protection elements. It does appear many designers now forget about the simple things like how eaves can bring other important benefits like shading during the heat of the summer.

Unfortunately by clipping the eave, you bring water closer to the wall of the home and all openings and horizontal details on it. If there is no eave, water in the gutter is right next to the wall/roof intersection and the effects of pressurisation need careful consideration (I am getting out of my water-tightness knowledge depth here!).  The lesser the depth of the eave the higher the risk of the detail you will be constructing. The higher the risk, the higher level of scrutiny needs to be devoted to ensure quality during detail design and construction.

As recent as last weekend I viewed a property in a popular beach resort that has all the hallmarks of a leaky home – built in the 90’s,  lack of head flashings, monolithic cladding system down to the ground, some cracks, no cavity, and numerous other problem indicators. However, whilst it will probably deteriorate faster over time as any driving weather eventually finds its way through a proven failed cladding system,  this building had no leaks – what it did have was substantial eaves!

I am conscious that the thousands of houses my team has responsibility for developing over the coming years are built to a high quality that lasts; despite budget cuts that could affect maintenance budgets despite; despite gutters that get clogged; despite some failure of some material we don’t yet know about; despite weather-tightness guarantees our contractors provide; and despite how fail safe cladding manufactures market their products as.

To that end we have just implemented a quality assurance process if we are forced to create an eave that is less that 300mm deep. This involves an independent review and inspection of the design and the construction by an independent registered building surveyor (RICS qualified preferred), making these eaves a focus of quality assurance in  the project control meetings and the development and project managers eyeballing the detail and workmanship on site.

Eaves are easy. Eaves work. Long live the eave.

Andrew Crosby
www.aenspire.com

 


26
Mar 15

Angel Consulting Services

Similar to Angel Investors,  Angel Consulting is based on a high risk, high return investment strategy.  We invest our time and intellectual resource strategically on high risk, high growth opportunities. For those client opportunities that don’t monetize we treat our losses as experience for continuous improvement.

This service is a simple proposition to executive clients: if you do not profit from the consultancy assignment you do not pay.

To discuss your companies next light bulb moment contact angelconsulting@aenspire.com

 AngelConsulting.pdf

angelconsulting


21
Mar 15

Inform – Blog writing and whitepaper production for property, construction and real estate companies

inform_edited-1

You’ve seen your competitor blogs shared on LinkedIn, you look at their websites and find they offer all types of free analysis and industry insight. They are gaining traction with their profile and really showcasing their experience. In fact they appear to have become the experts in their field – and that is a threat to your business.

Blogs, industry whitepapers and providing real value online takes time and effort.  Whilst you may have best intentions you never seem to get around to starting let alone the time to regularly maintain them.

Three key reasons for maintaining a regular and insightful blog and series of whitepapers:

  1. Demonstrate your expert status, experience and capabilities without trying to sell yourself.
  2. Each article can be sent to existing and new clients as a means of keeping in contact, relevant to their needs and in front of mind.
  3. A professionally presented recent article that is relevant to the business you are trying to win is a powerful influencer in your marketing bid package.

Inform, by aenspire.com, can help your company gain the exposure you rightly deserve. We make it easy for you.

Our experience includes numerous blogs, published newspaper articles, and whitepaper production over 16 years in the property, construction and real estate industries. One claim to fame is Donald Trump featured as guest interviewee for a client’s blog article.

Inform services include

Ghost Blog Writing – we write topical and informative articles on your behalf. We undertake relevant research, piece together examples of your experience, create the interest angle and publish on your blog.

Blog Interviews – we write articles for you, introducing you in an interview type format. You provide a recent engagement or area or interest and we craft interview questions to solicit responses that help demonstrate your expertise in this area. Interviewees may include your clients and suppliers.

Whitepapers – we undertake in-depth analysis and create a formal, factual ‘paper’ that you can use to post on a blog, send to clients or leave as part of your marketing pitch. They key here, is you are offering real value and advice not just some sales teaser. The more structured and professional the more impact to demonstrate your expertise to peers and clients.

 

PDF: Inform-byaenspire.pdf
Contact: 
inform@aenspire.com